Is the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?

Puff Bar

Is the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?

Puff Bar is a good alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is manufactured with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can Puff Bar make it normally as you want and never have to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s great for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.

Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, which was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.

One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Due to this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that people who use their product to lose weight can easily do so when they only need to carry around the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.

By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert which allows one to put it into your mouth, which means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you might go. If the product also has an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke another one.

Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. Along with sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested they call it a “tobacco alternative”.

What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco into the marketplace.

Along with the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to the younger generations, this could substantially decrease the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative that may not supply them with nicotine.

It seems that the UK government may have a point. There’s currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning labels on their products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem just like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which in turn means that fewer people will purchase them.